You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
Which words do you feel you weren't able to use? Please feel free to say them right now in this post. Which racial and ethnic and gender-based slurs have you been holding back? Please provide a full list.
You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
Your comment is only true to the extent that they could still join the MLS, which is not true for most of the country. This requirement that you must be a REALTOR to join your MLS must end.
You don't need to be a REALTOR in California to belong to the MLS but it is likely your fees will be higher to be a non-member of the MLS. Then you have to deal with lockboxes since ours are not managed or owned by our MLS and of course access to the forms again not controlled by the MLS
As I said, this is not true for most of the country. Only in a few states, like California, is it illegal to tie the two together. In terms of higher fees, that is an admission that most local REALTOR associations cannot exist financially without the revenue from the MLS. You do not need to be a REALTOR to purchase and use Zipforms.
The cost of ZipForms for non-members is well over $1000 per year again far exceeds the cost of membership. In California many MLS' are not owned or operated by local associations but you are correct about how many do rely on the MLS for additional funding to run their local associations
Michael. Yes, the cost of Zipforms is set by design to cost more than annual REALTOR dues, but it is still obtainable without being a REALTOR, which was my point. The vast majority of MLSs in California may not be operated by a local, but are considered owned or are considered "association affiliated". CRMLS is one of those. Either way it's moot to this discussion, except for the fact that the MLS revenue is often more than 50% of the total for a local. Also, keep in mind that we're talking about a national perspective, here, not just California, and disconnecting the MLS from the REALTOR association is long over due...they should each stand on thier own.
You are entitled to your opinion, and I support your right to voice them.
Sad that opinion is to silence your fellow REALTORS, who you hate, so you are spreading messages rooted in hate towards people different from you. But I tolerate you.
But your words are there for all to see. No twisting is required for everyone to see how you are filled with hate against conservatives and Christians who are different from you.
YES, I am well aware of the case and have read it and the others in detail. Your opinion. Thanks for sharing but I still support the NAR Code. Have a productive day
You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
Which words do you feel you weren't able to use? Please feel free to say them right now in this post. Which racial and ethnic and gender-based slurs have you been holding back? Please provide a full list.
You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
You forgot the testimony of Brandon Huber who spoke honestly and passionately about what he and his family and church have and continue to still endure.
Once the MLS is taken away from REALTOR Associations, your wish will come true.
Many aren't owned by the associations already
And the law applies to them equally.
Your comment is only true to the extent that they could still join the MLS, which is not true for most of the country. This requirement that you must be a REALTOR to join your MLS must end.
You don't need to be a REALTOR in California to belong to the MLS but it is likely your fees will be higher to be a non-member of the MLS. Then you have to deal with lockboxes since ours are not managed or owned by our MLS and of course access to the forms again not controlled by the MLS
As I said, this is not true for most of the country. Only in a few states, like California, is it illegal to tie the two together. In terms of higher fees, that is an admission that most local REALTOR associations cannot exist financially without the revenue from the MLS. You do not need to be a REALTOR to purchase and use Zipforms.
The cost of ZipForms for non-members is well over $1000 per year again far exceeds the cost of membership. In California many MLS' are not owned or operated by local associations but you are correct about how many do rely on the MLS for additional funding to run their local associations
Michael. Yes, the cost of Zipforms is set by design to cost more than annual REALTOR dues, but it is still obtainable without being a REALTOR, which was my point. The vast majority of MLSs in California may not be operated by a local, but are considered owned or are considered "association affiliated". CRMLS is one of those. Either way it's moot to this discussion, except for the fact that the MLS revenue is often more than 50% of the total for a local. Also, keep in mind that we're talking about a national perspective, here, not just California, and disconnecting the MLS from the REALTOR association is long over due...they should each stand on thier own.
You are entitled to your opinion, and I support your right to voice them.
Sad that opinion is to silence your fellow REALTORS, who you hate, so you are spreading messages rooted in hate towards people different from you. But I tolerate you.
Good job trying to twist my words but you often do that to many who don't agree with you
Thanks!
But your words are there for all to see. No twisting is required for everyone to see how you are filled with hate against conservatives and Christians who are different from you.
HAHAHAHAHA NICE TRY
Did you even read the cases? I am a
full blooded, one hundred percent atheist. Wilson was found guilty of reposting a bible verse in 2015 - about marriage. Horrible.
His case is the poster child of NAR overreach.
Good riddance to the speech code!
YES, I am well aware of the case and have read it and the others in detail. Your opinion. Thanks for sharing but I still support the NAR Code. Have a productive day
No matter…it's going away.