Thank you for another thought-provoking post that challenges us to consider important issues from different perspectives.
Volunteer leadership brings two complex forces to the table—our profound passion for our industry and the significant influence that leadership positions entail. While I agree that 10-5 should be repealed, the reality of our slow-moving, bloated governance structure makes quick action nearly impossible. With a massive board that only convenes twice a year, our voices are often stifled. By the time we even begin to address issues like 10-5, the next administration in Washington D.C. could be well into implementing its vision.
NAR needs streamlined governance that allows elected and appointed leaders a real opportunity to voice member concerns. I have plenty of ideas on how we can achieve that, but I’ll save those for another time.
Regarding national leadership elections, having served as President of the largest state Realtor association, I know firsthand the dedication and sacrifice involved in representing our members and the public. I deeply respect every volunteer who steps up. However, we need a national election process that genuinely allows for contested elections. Currently, leadership pipelines seem predetermined for many years, creating a culture where new voices hesitate to speak out. Contested elections, streamlined and with reduced campaign expenses, would not only empower fresh ideas but produce stronger, more resilient leaders. Listening to members and earning their support through a transparent process enriches leaders with the real-world insights they need to serve us better.
On a personal note, I've shared with you my own experiences of harassment and bullying in leadership. Recently, I was threatened with the loss of my NAR committee appointments—again. These attempts to silence me won’t deter my commitment to a healthier, more inclusive culture at NAR. I believe deeply that a more positive environment will emerge when members can bring their passion to the table without fear of retribution.
Thanks for the opportunity to share these thoughts.
Rob, NAR is irrelevant now. None of us who are actually out doing business give a flying F what they have to say or what they do. They are impediment to progress and innovation because they lack the cognitive ability to understand their constituency let alone whats at stake for private property rights. They’ve been consumed with Woke DEI bullshit that has blinded them. They destroyed a vibrant org that used to care about consumers and private property rights. Now, it’s just matter of time before they fold. The sooner they’re gone the better.
I’ve got a headline for your next article: “NAR: just a dead man walking now.”
Good riddance. I’d flip the switch myself if I could.
Trump won on a mix of vibes and misinformation, not his unpopular policy positions, which his voters are either unaware of or have a distorted view of. He does not have a mandate for what he actually wants to do.
Rob,
Thank you for another thought-provoking post that challenges us to consider important issues from different perspectives.
Volunteer leadership brings two complex forces to the table—our profound passion for our industry and the significant influence that leadership positions entail. While I agree that 10-5 should be repealed, the reality of our slow-moving, bloated governance structure makes quick action nearly impossible. With a massive board that only convenes twice a year, our voices are often stifled. By the time we even begin to address issues like 10-5, the next administration in Washington D.C. could be well into implementing its vision.
NAR needs streamlined governance that allows elected and appointed leaders a real opportunity to voice member concerns. I have plenty of ideas on how we can achieve that, but I’ll save those for another time.
Regarding national leadership elections, having served as President of the largest state Realtor association, I know firsthand the dedication and sacrifice involved in representing our members and the public. I deeply respect every volunteer who steps up. However, we need a national election process that genuinely allows for contested elections. Currently, leadership pipelines seem predetermined for many years, creating a culture where new voices hesitate to speak out. Contested elections, streamlined and with reduced campaign expenses, would not only empower fresh ideas but produce stronger, more resilient leaders. Listening to members and earning their support through a transparent process enriches leaders with the real-world insights they need to serve us better.
On a personal note, I've shared with you my own experiences of harassment and bullying in leadership. Recently, I was threatened with the loss of my NAR committee appointments—again. These attempts to silence me won’t deter my commitment to a healthier, more inclusive culture at NAR. I believe deeply that a more positive environment will emerge when members can bring their passion to the table without fear of retribution.
Thanks for the opportunity to share these thoughts.
Another REALTOR being persecuted for their religious beliefs: https://cbn.com/news/us/virginia-real-estate-agent-could-lose-license-posting-scriptures-about-marriage?fbclid=IwY2xjawGpgoJleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHY1fY44P19JvcQhBrvCI4j021yl98e9QexKCMtaz4glhuxfDivtC-nplXw_aem_ri47iG9AFPrhR9zT08ShqA
The abuse must stop. It will stop one way or another.
Rob, NAR is irrelevant now. None of us who are actually out doing business give a flying F what they have to say or what they do. They are impediment to progress and innovation because they lack the cognitive ability to understand their constituency let alone whats at stake for private property rights. They’ve been consumed with Woke DEI bullshit that has blinded them. They destroyed a vibrant org that used to care about consumers and private property rights. Now, it’s just matter of time before they fold. The sooner they’re gone the better.
I’ve got a headline for your next article: “NAR: just a dead man walking now.”
Good riddance. I’d flip the switch myself if I could.
Trump won on a mix of vibes and misinformation, not his unpopular policy positions, which his voters are either unaware of or have a distorted view of. He does not have a mandate for what he actually wants to do.
I don't think you know how voter mandates work.
So you're OK with NAR keeping their speech code? Are you a REALTOR agent or a REALTOR broker?