Maybe I Was Wrong? A Follow-up to the Vague Threats Post
In which I engage in my favorite activity -- seeing if I was wrong
I like debates. Not because I like fighting — though I kinda do — but because I learn things through debates, especially if I am wrong. And the motto around these parts is, “Strong opinions, weakly held.”
After my last post about Michael Ketchmark’s odd threats about “enforcing the settlement agreement” I received multiple emails and messages from friends who are in the industry and are lawyers. One in particular took me to task — very nicely, mind you — for being not just wrong, but dangerously wrong.
That being a serious charge, I wanted to write this follow-up acknowledging any errors and then extending things further. This is likely to get a bit… ah… nitpicky, because words matter to lawyers and we need to get into some of that to understand what’s what.
At the end of the analysis, however, we will have a major takeaway.
Let’s do this.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Notorious R.O.B. to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.